Unlawful warrants: Police feared Andrew might delay access by saying home belonged to King

Why police sought warrants

Police argued that any delay could undermine the searches and prevent investigators from collecting evidence. They cited the seriousness of the investigation in asking the court to issue warrants.

Evidence investigators wanted

The documents describe information police hoped to find about events after the FBI released material concerning Jeffrey Epstein. They also refer to allegations that Mountbatten-Windsor, while serving as a UK trade envoy, sent Epstein official reports from visits to Singapore, Vietnam, China and Hong Kong.

Investigators also referred to a possible connection between meetings with a private investment firm and a subsequent suggestion to Epstein that he invest in it. Mountbatten-Windsor has denied wrongdoing in relation to Epstein.

Warrants ruled unlawful

At a High Court hearing earlier this month, Thames Valley Police accepted that the warrants used to search the properties were unlawful. The force said the court had issued them under the wrong part of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984.

The search of Royal Lodge continued until 24 February, according to the documents. Police still hold items taken during the searches, and a hearing in 2027 is expected to determine whether they can be used as evidence.

Investigation remains open

The force said the ruling overturning the warrants does not end its investigation or make all of it unlawful. Mountbatten-Windsor remains under police investigation despite the court’s decision on the searches.

The BBC said it had contacted his representatives for comment. Police have not said that the seized material can be used; that question is due to be considered at the later hearing.