Over threats and publicity, judge allows Jane Doe to remain anonymous in Cornell University sexual assault lawsuit

Privacy protections ordered

Phaedra Perry-Bond granted Jane Doe’s request to keep her identity private. The judge pointed to the publicity surrounding the allegations, the risk of retaliation and threats, and potential harm from publicly identifying the plaintiff.

Court filings must conceal Jane Doe’s identity and other sensitive personal information. Defendants may privately receive identifying information when needed to investigate the claims and prepare a defense, under confidentiality protections.

Perry-Bond also encouraged wider privacy safeguards for defendants and witnesses. She said anonymity should also be considered for defendants and welcomed a filing seeking that protection.

Warning against harassment

The judge warned that cyberstalking, harassment or threats directed at Jane Doe, the defendants or their attorneys could result in criminal prosecution. The ruling addresses privacy during the lawsuit, not the merits of the claims. It does not determine whether any defendant is liable.

Allegations and denials

Jane Doe’s civil lawsuit alleges that seven men drugged, gang-raped and sexually assaulted her at the Chi Phi fraternity house in 2024. The seven former fraternity members have denied the allegations.