I Tried Hoka and Asics’ Most Cushioned Shoes: Here’s Which Felt More Comfortable

Two Highly Cushioned Walking Shoes

The reviewer, who enjoys plush sneakers for absorbing impact during long days on her feet, had recently started wearing Asics’s Gel-Slowcush. She compared it with Hoka’s Bondi, a shoe she described as a standard-setter for cushioning.

Hoka’s Bondi is recommended for uses including walking and arch support, and has received the American Podiatric Medical Association’s Seal of Acceptance. The article says podiatrists often recommend the neutral trainer for extended standing and walking because of its shock-absorbing midsole.

Updates And Design Differences

The Bondi 9 adds 2 millimeters of cushioning to its already high midsole. A senior reviews and commerce editor previously described the shoe as a cushioned dream, while noting that it maintained arch support.

Asics calls the Gel-Slowcush its most cushioned sneaker and says it is designed for everyday mileage, particularly recovery days. Its midsole foam and cushioning technology are intended to soften landings; the model also accommodates neutral walkers and people who underpronate.

Testing Fit And Comfort

The reviewer had worn the Bondi 9 since August and began testing the Gel-Slowcush in early October. She wore both for daily walks, trips through New York City streets and parks, subway commutes, errands and other outings.

She chose her usual size—size 7 in regular width—and found both shoes true to size. The Hoka’s molded collar and padded tongue felt structured and secure, especially around the ankle; the Asics upper and thinner, stretchier tongue felt softer and more flexible.

Both shoes were breathable and comfortable, but the Asics weighed 10.5 ounces, more than an ounce heavier than the Bondi 9. The account describes their different fits but does not provide a final verdict on which felt more comfortable overall.