Trump’s $10bn defamation lawsuit against BBC allowed to proceed in part by federal judge

Court lets part of case proceed
Federal judge Jeffrey T Kuntz ruled on Tuesday that Trump’s case against the BBC may continue in part. He denied some of the broadcaster’s motion to dismiss the lawsuit.
The $10bn claim concerns the Panorama programme Trump: A Second Chance. It spliced together remarks Trump made before the 6 January US Capitol insurrection, with the remarks nearly 55 minutes apart.
Judge examines documentary edit
The BBC has apologized for the editing. Kuntz said the gap between the statements could support a plausible inference that the broadcaster knew, or should have known, the resulting segment was not truthful.
Kuntz wrote that the edit went beyond trimming a speech and created something different from what Trump had said. He also said Trump’s allegations about the BBC’s departure from journalistic standards plausibly suggested more than negligence.
Separate claim dismissed
The judge dismissed Trump’s claim that the BBC violated Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act. That claim will not proceed, unlike the defamation lawsuit in part.
Deposition deadline set earlier
In late October, a Florida magistrate judge ruled that Trump must sit for a deposition conducted by BBC lawyers by 11 December. The ruling said he could face sanctions if he did not comply.
Key points
- The judge allowed part of Trump’s $10bn defamation lawsuit against the BBC to proceed.
- The case centers on comments joined in a Panorama documentary despite being nearly 55 minutes apart.
- The judge dismissed Trump’s claim under Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act.
- A Florida magistrate judge set an 11 December deadline for Trump’s deposition or possible sanctions.

