Five million accounts closed as Australian government defends social media ban for under-16s in court

Arguments over the ban

At a two-day hearing, government lawyers said social media could expose children to harms including depression, anxiety and suicidal ideation. They characterized the measure as limited in scope and said its effect on political expression was indirect.

Reddit told the court it should not be among the 10 platforms covered by the age restrictions. The company called the policy poorly targeted and too broad.

Court weighs competing rights

The country’s highest court adjourned on Wednesday after hearing arguments over two days. Judges must decide whether the ban’s benefits outweigh limits on freedom of political expression, with a decision expected in the coming months.

The legal challenge could have consequences beyond Australia. A ruling against the government could hinder other countries considering comparable measures.

Other countries watching

Australia became the first country to enforce a social media ban for children younger than 16 last year. The policy prompted France, the United Kingdom and several other countries to explore similar restrictions.

Government figures released in July said five million social media accounts had been shut since the ban began in December. However, officials acknowledged that some under-16s continue to access platforms by bypassing age-verification systems.

Enforcement remains an issue

In June, the government said it was considering tougher laws supporting the ban. It is also preparing an enforcement lawsuit. The court’s forthcoming decision will address the challenge to Australia’s approach as authorities continue efforts to enforce the age limit.