Why Shedeur Sanders may become the NFL’s Angel Reese, thanks to insufferable supporters
A familiar debate takes shape
The article compares discussion of Sanders, a former Colorado quarterback, with the treatment of Reese in the WNBA. It argues that some of their supporters cast criticism of the athletes as evidence of racial bias.
Criticism framed as discrimination
The piece says questions about Sanders’ NFL abilities can lead to critics being labeled discriminatory rather than simply skeptical. It also describes claims that NFL general managers are conspiring against the young quarterback.
The article draws a parallel with criticism of Reese’s offensive efficiency, shot selection and comparisons with Caitlin Clark. It says such criticism can prompt accusations of racial bias.
The author’s central argument
The author’s view is that Sanders has become the NFL’s Angel Reese because of what the piece calls victimhood narratives promoted by some devoted supporters. It says the comparison is not necessarily about what either athlete has done on the field or court, or in the media.
A quoted remark from Carton questions why Sanders did not play for the Browns, while referring to what Carton calls race baiters. The article presents the exchange as part of the wider discourse around Sanders.
Key points
- The article compares debate around Shedeur Sanders with coverage of Angel Reese.
- It argues that some supporters treat criticism of Sanders as evidence of racial discrimination.
- The piece says Reese’s offensive efficiency and shot selection have also drawn accusations of racial bias.
- It cites reactions after the 2025 NFL Draft and references Skip Bayless and ESPN personalities.