Skip to content
SurenoGet Sureno Browser
← Sureno News

Why cities want the boot on robotaxis as local rules multiply

Federal delay shifts decisions locally

Nevada became the first state to legalize self-driving cars on public roads in June 2011. Google supported the law to make Nevada a testing ground for its prototypes, and the legislation exempted drivers from text-messaging bans when automated systems were engaged.

Years later, federal legislation to set rules for autonomous vehicles remains stalled in Congress, while federal regulators work on safety standards. Local officials have stepped in to set operating rules, producing a patchwork that industry leaders had hoped to avoid.

Cities set limits on operations

Municipalities generally cannot set vehicle manufacturing standards, but they have broad authority over street operations. They are using that power to shape how robotaxis operate, though there is no exact count of local regulations adopted since the services became mainstream.

Emergency concerns add pressure

In Austin, firefighters have raised concerns about Tesla’s Cybercab, which lacks a steering wheel and pedals. They say that design could complicate efforts by first responders to move a stalled vehicle.

Firefighters want developers to establish dedicated rapid-response towing procedures and direct communication between human operators and emergency personnel. As robotaxis reach more cities, officials are identifying unintended consequences and considering additional rules.

Key points

  • Federal legislation establishing autonomous-vehicle rules has been stalled in Congress for years.
  • Minneapolis is weighing a requirement for human monitors inside autonomous vehicles.
  • San Diego’s City Council passed a resolution seeking to restrict Waymo’s airport access.
  • Austin firefighters want towing procedures and operator communications for emergencies involving robotaxis.
Read the original on The Verge ↗

More news

Loading more stories…