What smart people are saying about the AI apocalypse and calls to slow everything down
What smart people in business and tech are saying about AI bans for schools
What smart people are saying about Trump's acquisition of Venezuelan oil
What smart people in markets are saying about Kevin Warsh's Jackson Hole speech
It took the possibility of species annihilation, but AI leaders did something remarkable this weekend: They reached a consensus.
After ex-Anthropic engineer Jacob Coxon's warnings about a looming AI armageddon lit a firestorm among techies and politicians alike, the leaders of the most advanced AI labs came to a tentative agreement — largely via posts on X — that some sort of slowdown is necessary to save humanity.
While they were largely short on details regarding the mechanics of such a thing, and notable China has not weighed in, the American AI industry has reached an inflection point that could impact everything from your phone's chatbot to global politics.
"The stakes are too high for pacing to be an empty exercise — we need to use the time it gives us wisely," Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei wrote in an essay entitled "We must pace the frontier," which was published Saturday.
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, who has made similar calls in the past, agreed in an X post later that day. So did Elon Musk. Google DeepMind founder Demis Hassabis also offered his support for Amodei's proposals.
Here's a look at what smart people are saying about the AI apocalypse and the methods the leaders of the leading AI labs say are necessary to stop it.
The Trump administration has repeatedly signaled disinterest in regulating AI development as it seeks to keep pace with China. David Sacks, a presidential advisor on science and tech and the former White House AI Czar, reiterated that stance on Saturday, with a bit of a twist.
"Dario has written that we need to 'pace the frontier,' and Sam has agreed. People may be surprised by my response: go ahead," Sacks wrote on X. "But stop pretending you need anyone else's permission."
Sacks browbeat OpenAI and Anthropic in his post, saying that the companies didn't want to slow down for altruistic reasons, but to gain favor in the markets.
Dive deeper
- What smart people in business and tech are saying about AI bans for schools
- What smart people are saying about Trump's acquisition of Venezuelan oil
- What smart people in markets are saying about Kevin Warsh's Jackson Hole speech
- It took the possibility of species annihilation, but AI leaders did something remarkable this weekend: They reached a consensus.
- After ex-Anthropic engineer Jacob Coxon's warnings about a looming AI armageddon lit a firestorm among techies and politicians alike, the leaders of the most advanced AI labs came to a tentative agreement — largely via posts on X — that som
More for you





